Vaccination: Making an informed choice

It has been said that an informed choice is a decision made after learning relevant facts (informing oneself) about the focus of the decision.
In the case of vaccination the “relevant facts” we need to be informed about are ALL  the pros and cons of vaccination.

However  the cons are often dismissed/or not documented thus the evidence is not there officially/on paper even if people do get ill as has been mine and the experience of many people…

Also the very people,

  1. who are deemed the experts by the governments and health authorities,
  2. who we are taught to hold in very high regard through our education system
  3. who are considered to be qualified to vaccinate our children

are also the people being given perks and cash benefits by the producers of the vaccines directly or indirectly .. 😦

Well, how can anyone make a REAL informed decision on vaccinating their child when such conflict of interest exists? ..

Below finding may be of some interest..

“More broadly, a study in the New England Journal of Medicine found that 71.2% of authors fail to properly disclose their conflicts of interest. So the problem is widespread. When it comes to GSK and Avandia specifically, doctors on the company payroll were found in a British Medical Journal study to be more likely to say favorable things about the drug.”

The below website is fairly interesting, if you want to make an informed choice.
http://www.exploringvaccines.com

The below book may be of some help too..
A shot in the dark.

And finally I would like to share with you all that the Rheumatoid arthritis I contracted after being inflicted by the rubella vaccine could well have been avoided if I had had the below information to make an INFORMED CHOICE

http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/rubella.htm
Rubella;

Adverse Effects Of Rubella Immunization
Source: Antiviral Weekly

“Rubella (German measles) immunization has been available since the 1960s. Since then, reports have shown that between 10 and 40 percent of women who previously had no immunity to rubella experience joint disorders after immunization that can cause pain in joints such as the ankles and knees. In the May 5 issue of the Lancet, Professor Aubrey Tingle and colleagues from Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, reported their investigation of the association of acute and recurrent joint and neurological manifestations in previously healthy women who were immunized shortly after giving birth.”

I suffered from the crippling pain of rheumatoid arthritis that made me suicidal from the age of 13/14. I always managed to cover up my state with a plastic smile but life was like hell on earth..

It started straight after being vaccinated for rubella.

Why is Professor Aubrey Tingle’s findings  NOT presented to those recieving the rubella vaccine?

I became symptom free after I embraced a largely raw food lifestyle at the age of 38..  However I have the legacy of that “attack by vaccination” in the form of deformed weak joints and organ damage caused by the gold injections I was given and the side effects of the high doses of NSAIDS I was given…

I sometimes wonder how much profits have been made at the expense of my suffering by the various “structures” put into place to doctor humanity?

And even more importantly, how much profit and control has been made and is planned for humanity in the forseeable future by the pharma cartels and their friends?

So many people say they have made an informed decision when it comes to vaccination but in view of this and many other such information it always sounds hollow to me….

Heaven help the masses…



Where do you get your calcium from? Part II

So, a lot can be done to ensure that people do not have demineralised bones.

One important step is to redefine ones nutritional truths.  For me one such

“truth” is  the misplaced reverence behind cows milk.

The human body is magnificently engineered. Even if we place less then ideal substances such as cows milk, it will attempt to digest it the best it can.

This ability varies from person to person.

The body takes out useful nutrients and stores away the poisons or/and excretes the poisons. For example, a malnourished child needs fat and various other things found in cow’s milk. The body tries to thrive on this less then ideal substance and to an extent it does in that the human does not get symptoms such as allergies etc straight away usually. And even when they do the connection between the milk and the illness is not made. This situation can be likened to putting a mixture of diesel and petrol in a petrol only car. It may manage to go but the engine will get damaged or not perform at its best.

In India where many children were/are malnourished, cow’s milk is highly revered. Thin children grow quickly on a diet of milk and dairy.  Many a poor mothers have seen their children outwardly thrive on cow’s milk.

Ok, let us see how cow’s milk works.

The average dairy cow of yesteryears reached sexual maturity at the age of 24 human months. Imagine this tiny little calf turned into a fully grown animal within 2 years. Nature by design made this milk very rich and full of natural growth hormones suitable for an animal that had to grow into an adult within 2 years.

A human child having this on a regular basis would also be affected by these growth hormones, the fat, the proteins etc and grow quickly. Growth in size is the indicator used to measure health by most people, (as that is what they are taught) they will accept milk as having given their child health.

But this milk with the high phosphorous content and low magnesium content is much  harder to digest and assimilate. The child may develop asthma, allergies etc. (Most mammals stop producing the enzyme lactase to digest the lactose in milk by the weaning stage. Humans are no different) In the absence of lactase the human body gets poisoned by the presence of cows milk.

The below information is from  www.notmilk.com

“Formula-fed babies, at the age of three months, were secreting low levels of serum antibodies to bovine proteins contained in their formula.”

“A Prospective Study of Humoral Immune Response to Cow Milk Antigens in the First Year of Life” Pediatric-Allergy-Immunology, August, 1994, 5(3)

“Most formula fed infants developed symptoms of ALLERGIC rejection to cow milk proteins before one month of age. About 50-70% experienced rashes or other skin symptoms, 50-60 percent gastrointestinal symptoms, and 20-30 percent respiratory symptoms. The recommended therapy is to avoid cow’s milk.”

“Epidemiological and Immunological Aspects of Cow’s Milk Protein ALLERGY and Intolerance in Infancy.” Pediatric-Allergy-Immunology, August, 1994, 5(5 Suppl.)

 NEW YORK TIMES - WEDNESDAY, MAY 5, 1999, Page B-1
 "38% ASTHMA RATE FOUND IN HOMELESS CHILDREN" A photo of a small African-American boy wearing an oxygen
mask accompanies Three hundred lines of text.
 One sentence is devoted to the probable cause:
"...exposure to factors like cockroach feces, dust mites, mold, dampness, rat and mouse urine and crowded living
conditions."
Homeless people live in shelters and get free room and board.  They get FREE cheese and milk which serves as the
foundation of their diet.

My mother lost two brothers both at the age of six months. They went to sleep seemingly healthy and never woke up. Many seemingly healthy babies died in the olden days. I wonder how many died because of their inability to digest cow’s milk?


A worst scenario has existed for the last few decades due to the quality of the milk. And that is the modern factory farmed cows and the pus, antibiotics, GM hormones infested milk they produce.

The modern cow is injected with so much growth hormones (bovine growth hormone) that it is forced to reach sexual maturity in 12 months.  You don’t have to imagine what this does to all those who consume its meat and milk.

As the child grows quickly the parents encourage the consumption of dairy, believing it is and it will strengthen their children’s bones. They marvel at their children getting even taller than them. Girls start menstruating from around the age of 10 onwards.

At this point I would like to bring you to the rule mammals generally follow regarding life expectancy.

That rule is: Multiply the years taken to reach sexual maturity by six. This is not something I have made up but an observation made by zoologists.

So, a cow that is allowed to live the course of its life naturally without being injected should have a life expectancy approximately of 12 human years.

Could we not deduce then that humans who reach sexual maturity earlier will die earlier?

Well let us look at what is actually happening to us through the modern diet, medication and lifestyle.

Diseases of old age are hitting people at much earlier years.

Below I will quote from the following website the conclusion to a very interesting article on health and longevity.

www.holistichealthtopics.com/HMG/trends.html

Conclusion

In spite of the fact that those who have a vested interest in our current orthodox medicine based health care system have a history of putting a spin on figures related to health trends, there is absolutely no doubt that the practice of orthodox medicine has coincided with a continuing deterioration in major public health indicators. The following health indicators confirm this simple fact.

  • Heart disease and cancer death rates have increased by more than 200% – 300% in the past 100 years and the incidence of heart disease is still increasing.
  • Health surveys reveal that an increasing number of people are suffering from one or more chronic illnesses.
  • The incidence of various disorders, including diabetes and obesity, are increasing throughout the Western world.
  • There has been no increase in total life span or longevity over the past century. Although we are managing to prolong the lives of many who are ill we are also becoming sicker earlier in life.
  • More people are spending a greater period of their lives suffering from one or more disabilities. This is not related to increased life expectancy.
  • There is a continuing increase in the per capita use of medical services – although more people are going to the doctor more often, they are becoming sicker in spite of reductions in smoking and increasing use of diet and exercise programs. (people change diet slightly eg 5 portions of fruit etc a day but the old staples such as dairy and excessive consumption of protein are still there generally..)
  • There continues to be an astonishing increase in the use of pharmaceutical products and prescription drugs – a fact which correlates with a deterioration in public health. The more drugs we take, the sicker we are becoming.
  • The incidence of iatrogenic diseases is increasing alarmingly and has now become the third leading cause of death behind heart disease and cancer.

The direction in which public health is progressing under the influence of scientific medicine is made abundantly clear by the astonishing rapidity with which the three leading causes of death have skyrocketed to their current positions of ascendency. There is no cure in sight for the current epidemics of heart disease, cancer, and iatrogenic disease. If our health care system remains fundamentally reductionist, symptomatic and interventionist, all the available evidence indicates that these, and various other chronic diseases, will be the diseases of the future. Holistic therapies such as nutrition on the other hand, increasingly offer an effective solution.

http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/calcium.html

It is my wish that the independent scientific information offered in this article opens a door of curiosity so you  may investigate further  e.g see how you feel after a few days/weeks without any dairy… so as to draw your own conclusions.  😉


I am disgusted by the below news…

It Begins Next April Fools Day

“In the nastiest April Fool’s Joke of all time, the European Directive on Traditional Herbal Medicinal Products (THMPD) was enacted back on 31 March 2004.(1) It laid down rules and regulations for the use of herbal products that had previously been freely traded.

This directive requires that all herbal preparations must be put through the same kind of procedure as pharmaceuticals. It makes no difference whether a herb has been in common use for thousands of years. The costs for this are far higher than most manufacturers, other than Big Pharma, can bear, with estimates ranging from £80,000 to £120,000 per herb, and with each herb of a compound having to be treated separately.

It matters not that a herb has been used safely and effectively for thousands of years. It will be treated as if it were a drug. Of course, herbs are far from that. They’re preparations made from biological sources. They aren’t necessarily purified, as that can change their nature and efficacy, just as it can in food. It’s a distortion of their nature and the nature of herbalism to treat them like drugs. That, of course, makes no difference in the Big Pharma-ruled edifice of the EU, which has enshrined corporatism in its constitution.

Dr. Robert Verkerk of the Alliance for Natural Health, International (ANH) describes the problem of requiring drug-like compliance on herbal preparations:

Getting a classical herbal medicine from a non-European traditional medicinal culture through the EU registration scheme is akin to putting a square peg into a round hole. The regulatory regime ignores and thus has not been adapted to the specific traditions. Such adaptation is required urgently if the directive is not to discriminate against non-European cultures and consequently violate human rights. “

Above quoted from http://www.gaia-health.com


“All I wanna say is that they dont really care about us.”